<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ted, Ted, Ted</title>
	<link>http://www.tedtedted.com</link>
	<description>The dad. The entertainer. The cube rat.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lilly in the house by thestephy</title>
		<link>http://www.tedtedted.com/2008/04/22/lilly-in-the-house/#comment-14974</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 01:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tedtedted.com/2008/04/22/lilly-in-the-house/#comment-14974</guid>
					<description>Lilly is absolutely gorgeous. You have lovely children. I begin to wonder if there is still another woman in your life besides Laura and Lilly. Let's see some photos of Mary, please. Love &#38; hugs, Stephy (you never call, you never write)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lilly is absolutely gorgeous. You have lovely children. I begin to wonder if there is still another woman in your life besides Laura and Lilly. Let&#8217;s see some photos of Mary, please. Love &amp; hugs, Stephy (you never call, you never write)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Banjo hangout by Paul W. Caudell</title>
		<link>http://www.tedtedted.com/2006/08/17/banjo-hangout/#comment-14381</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tedtedted.com/2006/08/17/banjo-hangout/#comment-14381</guid>
					<description>I have a couple tenor banjos I need to sell. One is about a 1950's Gretch 'New Yorker', needs some minor trim replacement. The other is a 1928 Maybell by 'Slingerland'. The Maybell (unfortunely) is without the resinator-back, but except for the head is in good shape. Please advise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a couple tenor banjos I need to sell. One is about a 1950&#8217;s Gretch &#8216;New Yorker&#8217;, needs some minor trim replacement. The other is a 1928 Maybell by &#8216;Slingerland&#8217;. The Maybell (unfortunely) is without the resinator-back, but except for the head is in good shape. Please advise
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Golden Compass by Peter Hogness</title>
		<link>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/12/09/the-golden-compass/#comment-11718</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 06:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/12/09/the-golden-compass/#comment-11718</guid>
					<description>Yeah, I didn't mean earlier comment as an unqualified rave.  But since I would have been kept very happy just by the armored bears, everything else was a pleasant bonus.  Had heard how much the anti-organized-religion theme got bowdlerized, so I was pleased to find that the film still maintained some sense of "which side are you on" (besides that of the talking armored bears, of course)....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I didn&#8217;t mean earlier comment as an unqualified rave.  But since I would have been kept very happy just by the armored bears, everything else was a pleasant bonus.  Had heard how much the anti-organized-religion theme got bowdlerized, so I was pleased to find that the film still maintained some sense of &#8220;which side are you on&#8221; (besides that of the talking armored bears, of course)&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Golden Compass by ted</title>
		<link>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/12/09/the-golden-compass/#comment-11464</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/12/09/the-golden-compass/#comment-11464</guid>
					<description>Hm. The Coulter thing went right past me. I need to watch more TV.
What excited me the most about these books was their explicit opposition to the treacly, manipulative Narnia series. It took a lot of guts to try that "Republic of Heaven" idea in what was essentially a children's story, and I thought Pullman really made it work. I just wish the filmmakers had gone with that, instead of taking the Clintonian route of hiding the good stuff so deep one forgets where to find it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. The Coulter thing went right past me. I need to watch more TV.<br />
What excited me the most about these books was their explicit opposition to the treacly, manipulative Narnia series. It took a lot of guts to try that &#8220;Republic of Heaven&#8221; idea in what was essentially a children&#8217;s story, and I thought Pullman really made it work. I just wish the filmmakers had gone with that, instead of taking the Clintonian route of hiding the good stuff so deep one forgets where to find it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Golden Compass by Peter Hogness</title>
		<link>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/12/09/the-golden-compass/#comment-11457</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/12/09/the-golden-compass/#comment-11457</guid>
					<description>Many good things in this movie, and not just the armored bears and the steampunk visuals.  The fight for free thought rests on an alliance of the University and the Rabble (aka Salt of the Earth).

And it can't be a coincidence that the evil and venomous leggy blonde defender of power &#38; privilege is named Coulter....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many good things in this movie, and not just the armored bears and the steampunk visuals.  The fight for free thought rests on an alliance of the University and the Rabble (aka Salt of the Earth).</p>
<p>And it can&#8217;t be a coincidence that the evil and venomous leggy blonde defender of power &amp; privilege is named Coulter&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writers on strike by Peter H.</title>
		<link>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/11/06/writers-on-strike/#comment-9469</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/11/06/writers-on-strike/#comment-9469</guid>
					<description>That was good-- but here's a summary that's distilled to about 150 proof:

http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=127766&#38;title=moment-of-zen-torture

Advisory: the John McCain bit that follows will give your brain whiplash, but is maybe more related than you'd think.  And the web ad that follows _that_ is, unintentionally, priceless.  Another non sequitur that turns out to be related-- in this case, by proving Stewart's point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was good&#8211; but here&#8217;s a summary that&#8217;s distilled to about 150 proof:</p>
<p><a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=127766&amp;title=moment-of-zen-torture' rel='nofollow'>http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=127766&amp;title=moment-of-zen-torture</a></p>
<p>Advisory: the John McCain bit that follows will give your brain whiplash, but is maybe more related than you&#8217;d think.  And the web ad that follows _that_ is, unintentionally, priceless.  Another non sequitur that turns out to be related&#8211; in this case, by proving Stewart&#8217;s point.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solar by ted</title>
		<link>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/09/10/solar/#comment-8699</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 06:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/09/10/solar/#comment-8699</guid>
					<description>OK, I got some pics up. More to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I got some pics up. More to come.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solar by ted</title>
		<link>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/09/10/solar/#comment-8698</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 06:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/09/10/solar/#comment-8698</guid>
					<description>More.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solar by Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/09/10/solar/#comment-8696</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 02:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/09/10/solar/#comment-8696</guid>
					<description>Seriously! You moved? Say more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously! You moved? Say more!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solar by John Oberschelp</title>
		<link>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/09/10/solar/#comment-8615</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tedtedted.com/2007/09/10/solar/#comment-8615</guid>
					<description>WHAT? YOU'VE MOVED?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT? YOU&#8217;VE MOVED?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
